8/12/2023 0 Comments Madcap flare demo(This build never checks anything in, so it doesn't matter if it alters the Flare source after checking it out.) If that's hard, then we could work with a solution that shows, for each changed topic, the diff and a link to the right place in the output. A preprocessing step that locally modifies the XML source to, say, wrap font tags to change the color around changed parts before running the build would be fine. The ideal answer to this question would describe an automated path (no human intervention after setting it up) from the git diffs to highlighted changes in the output HTML. That question asks about ways to help reviewers attach their comments to specific changes this question is about identifying those changes in the output. This question is different from How can we make reviewing HTML documentation easier?. Is there a way to feed those git diffs into a Flare build (this probably involves preprocessing the source) so that in the output, diffs are highlighted? If showing deletions is hard, is there a way to at least mark, at the paragraph level, where there were changes? "Mark" can mean changebars, a font color change, an icon at the beginning of the paragraph - I don't much care what the marker is, as it'll only ever be seen in these review builds. Git knows where the diffs are on the branch. Jenkins checks out the branch from git in order to do the build. I'm looking for a way to make the specific changes more visible in the HTML output. We can give them a list of changed topics, but if a topic is long and the small-but-important change is those two paragraphs most of the way down, then either the writer has to construct detailed instructions for reviewers or reviewers have to scan everything looking for the change. But that just gets you a build reviewers still have to dig around to see what parts changed. That's fine in one sense - we can do a build from the branch, so reviewers can see what the documentation looks like. Some of our reviewers would prefer to look at the changes in the HTML output. This diff is very helpful for reviewing a PR, if you're comfortable reviewing by reading the raw XML. This means that at the end we have a git pull request (PR) that can show a diff between the branch and the main (master) branch. (Flare source is a very HTML-y XML with some Flare-specific additions.) We use git for source control and new work is done on branches. Print error code using ECHO %ERRORLEVEL% at the command prompt after build.We use Madcap Flare for a large documentation set, with HTML output. This value indicates the success, or lack of success, of the compilation and/or publishing process. Build output using the command line, Flare sends a value to the command line's ERRORLEVEL global variable. Using madbuild cli, there are warnings in the build of flare. Madbuild -project -target is representing specfic build target and -log true option will enable logging. $ madbuild -project MyProject.flprj -target MyTargetName Madbuild -project will build all targets available in current project.īuilding Specific Targets in Project Using the Command Line. Silent will install Flare in the background.īuilding Madcap Flare Project using madbuild cli.īuilding All Targets in Project Using the Command Line. $ cd C:\Download_path_for_SetupMadCapFlare Install Madcap Flare - Non-Intractive Mode.Ĭhange the directory path to where SetupMadCapFlare.exe is saved This executable is located in the Flare.app folder of your folder installation. To generate output from Flare targets using commands specified outside of the Flare user interface, you can use a command line executable called madbuild.exe. From the Batch Target Editor, you can select actions to take and schedule tasks. Using Madcap Flare, You can create batch targets for a project.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |